<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Join the Evolution &#187; trees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jointheevolution.ca/blog/tag/trees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jointheevolution.ca/blog</link>
	<description>Join the Organic Evolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 14:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>artificial CO2 gas capture &amp; storage &#8230; not quite fake, but not quite natural, either &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.jointheevolution.ca/blog/2009/07/17/artificial-co2-gas-capture-storage-not-quite-fake-but-not-quite-natural-either/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jointheevolution.ca/blog/2009/07/17/artificial-co2-gas-capture-storage-not-quite-fake-but-not-quite-natural-either/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniela</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[!!!!!!!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquatic ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geoengineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jointheevolution.ca/blog/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[humans are still trying to develop technologies that imitate natural processes &#8230; by far the most effective, efficient, time-tested, and safest carbon capture and storage technology is found in photosynthesizing plants, soil microorganisms, and marine and freshwater ecosystems &#8230; however, fancy human technology has joined the race &#8230;
what are the pros &#38; cons of artificial [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jointheevolution.ca/blog/2009/07/17/artificial-co2-gas-capture-storage-not-quite-fake-but-not-quite-natural-either/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

